Is the Federal Reserve Bank owned by private bankers?

August 7th, 2010 by Bank Loan | No Comments | Filed in Bank

Question by neb1gxj: Is the Federal Reserve Bank owned by private bankers?

Best answer:

Answer by gray shadow
Mostly no.

The Federal Reserve is a unique legal entity that can be described as an independent government agency with member bank participation. It is organized with a 100% government agency at the top (the Board of Governors), and branches beneath them that are organized like corporations with member banks as shareholders.(Ref: http://www.federalreserveeducation.org/fed101/structure/ , http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/faq/faqfrs.htm#4 )

The Board of Governors are all appointed for 14-year terms by the president and confirmed by congress. It operates per it’s charter and laws set by congress. it is overseen by congress. There is no structure or mechanism for private ownership at this level; it is a government agency. You can confirm this from a number of government sites that list it as a government agency (e.g. http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/independent-agencies.html) Board members are forbidden by law to have any economic interest in a private bank. (Ref: Title 12 chapter 3 of the U.S. Legal Code). The Board determines monetary policy and provides high level oversight of the branches.

The 12 branches can be considered highly regulated private corporations. Member banks are required to buy shares in their branch. Each bank has one vote. They can vote for 6 of their 9 board members, the other 3 are appointed by the Board of Governors. Though the branches are called non-profit, the member banks get a standard 6% dividend on their shares. The remaining ‘profit’ is turned over to the Treasury at the end of the year.

For confirmation on this, check out how Hoovers classifies them:

http://www.hoovers.com/free/search/simple/xmillion/index.xhtml?query_string=Federal+Reserve&which=company&page=1&x=91&y=2#HooversCompanyNameMatchesH2

And those shares that the member banks own? Some say there are so many restrictions that it falls short of true ownership

From Edward Griffin, noted anti-fed intellect (http://www.bigeye.com/griffin.htm)

“It’s a hybrid, part corporation and part government, part private, part government.
..
Every bank that’s in the system is an owner of the Federal Reserve… But that’s as far as it goes because those stock certificates do not carry with them any of the attributes of private ownership. For example, the holders of these certificates cannot sell them. If you can’t sell something then you don’t really own it, that’s one of the tests of ownership, your ability to dispose of it. You cannot sell it. Furthermore the larger banks put up more money than the smaller banks, it’s a ratio to their assets, so the larger banks have more stock certificates in the system than the small ones and yet regardless of the number that they hold, every bank has just one vote. There’s another violation of the principle of private ownership. Furthermore that vote doesn’t buy them anything. They can’t vote for anything of substance; they cannot vote for their national management which is the most important thing, isn’t it? The board of directors and chairman of the Federal Reserve System are appointed by the President, they’re not elected by the banks that are part of the system, the President does that.”

What do you think? Answer below!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

what are the names of the original private bankers that own the fed reserve?

August 7th, 2010 by Bank Loan | No Comments | Filed in Bank

Question by Mike: what are the names of the original private bankers that own the fed reserve?
when it was first created

Best answer:

Answer by gray shadow
Your question seems to be based on the premise that individuals can be owners of the Federal Reserve. In reality, there are no individuals who have any ownership.

The Federal Reserve was created in 1913, but there was a significant restructuring per the Bank Act of 1935 to put the whole system under control of a government agency.

To review the structure:

The Federal Reserve is a unique legal entity that can be described as an independent government agency with member bank participation. It is organized with a 100% government agency at the top (the Board of Governors), and branches beneath them that are organized like corporations with member banks as shareholders.(Ref: http://www.federalreserveeducation.org/fed101/structure/ , http://www.federalreserve.gov/generalinfo/faq/faqfrs.htm#4 )

The Board of Governors are all appointed for 14-year terms by the president and confirmed by congress. It operates per it’s charter and laws set by congress. it is overseen by congress. There is no structure or mechanism for private ownership at this level; it is a government agency. You can confirm this from a number of government sites that list it as a government agency (e.g. http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/independent-agencies.html) Board members are forbidden by law to have any economic interest in a private bank. (Ref: Title 12 chapter 3 of the U.S. Legal Code). The Board determines monetary policy and provides high level oversight of the branches.

The 12 branches can be considered highly regulated private corporations. Member banks are required to buy shares in their branch. Each bank has one vote. They can vote for 6 of their 9 board members, the other 3 are appointed by the Board of Governors. Though the branches are called non-profit, the member banks get a standard 6% dividend on their shares. The remaining ‘profit’ is turned over to the Treasury at the end of the year. All ‘national banks’ are members. You can review the list of national banks at http://www.helpwithmybank.gov/national_banks/bank_list.html .

For confirmation on this, check out how Hoovers classifies them:

http://www.hoovers.com/free/search/simple/xmillion/index.xhtml?query_string=Federal+Reserve&which=company&page=1&x=91&y=2#HooversCompanyNameMatchesH2

And those shares that the member banks own? Some say there are so many restrictions that it falls short of true ownership

From Edward Griffin, noted anti-fed intellect (http://www.bigeye.com/griffin.htm)

“It’s a hybrid, part corporation and part government, part private, part government.
..
Every bank that’s in the system is an owner of the Federal Reserve… But that’s as far as it goes because those stock certificates do not carry with them any of the attributes of private ownership. For example, the holders of these certificates cannot sell them. If you can’t sell something then you don’t really own it, that’s one of the tests of ownership, your ability to dispose of it. You cannot sell it. Furthermore the larger banks put up more money than the smaller banks, it’s a ratio to their assets, so the larger banks have more stock certificates in the system than the small ones and yet regardless of the number that they hold, every bank has just one vote. There’s another violation of the principle of private ownership. Furthermore that vote doesn’t buy them anything. They can’t vote for anything of substance; they cannot vote for their national management which is the most important thing, isn’t it? The board of directors and chairman of the Federal Reserve System are appointed by the President, they’re not elected by the banks that are part of the system, the President does that.”

Give your answer to this question below!

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Is US Bank Breaking the Law?

July 10th, 2010 by Bank Loan | 50 Comments | Filed in Loans

inflation.us Sign up to get our free report! en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org Is US Bank a legal CA Corporation? – US Bank is not listed with the CA Secretary of State. Interesting that when naming US Bancorp in a lawsuit, US Bancorp pushes all lawsuits onto “US Bank” (which doesn’t seem to be a legal entity) Is American Serving Co. a legal entity? – We have not been able to find ANY Articles of Incorporation anywhere in the United States for this major US Bank servicing agent. Did US Bank Verify Income on the Loans they Issued? – Did US Bank grant loans, fully aware of fraudulent borrower information? Where did US Bank get it’s Money? – If US Bank is claiming they were injured during a forclosure, don’t they need to provide basic accounting showing where the initial loan funding came from? Does US Bank have the Original Note from ANY loan? Is US Bank using lawful means to evict former homeowners from their properties?

ASTONISHING VIDEO EVIDENCE FOUND!!! the Clinton administration admitting their policy of “BANK AFFIRMATIVE ACTION”. Secretary Cuomo admits they forced banks to make BAD LOANS. Video also shows Obama’s tie to all this. Obama is seen discussing his legal and community organizing career. See how it ties in to ACORN and the Clinton administration enforcement of the Community Reinvestment Act.
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,